Allison Masaki, Zach Conley, Matt Lopez, Greg Gamel
|
Characteristic (page 38 and 380-382) |
Question |
Your observation |
|
Visibility of system status |
Does the web site tell you where you are? |
Yes, there is a title page for each main subject. Title tag is not being effectively used: currently, using URL address, could repeat title or be more descriptive over the site |
|
Match of system and the real world |
Does the web site use realistic language and conventions? |
Technical wording mixed with common understandable language |
|
User control and freedom |
Does the web site allow the user to control activities? |
No, feels like there are too many options and if mouse moves just a bit, there are too many options with other sub-categories |
|
Consistency with standards |
Does the web site present information and terms consistently? |
The Tech pages are consistent with tables and text, but if it is linked out, the pages change or documentation is too wordy to understand |
|
Error prevention |
Does the web site make it hard or easy to make mistakes? |
Very easy to make mistakes, no clarity to where user is on site. |
|
Recognition rather than recall |
Does the web site make you remember things or make things obvious? |
No, overload of information in technical terms, needed information is hidden quite well, |
|
Flexibility and efficiency of use |
Does the web site make it easy to do things in more than one way? |
No, there is no return to main page/back button; there is really no good navigation. There is also no site map. |
|
Minimalist design |
Does the web site encourage interaction? |
No, site seems to be very cold and technical, thus making the user shy away from interaction. |
|
Error recovery |
Are error messages plainly stated with clear solutions? |
There is an email to contact the webmaster for any questions to the site, but there is not a Q&A section available for common questions. |
|
Help and documentation |
Does the web site present help effectively? |
There is a lot of documentation but it is not organized well. It seems like there is too much documentation, which makes the user shy away from trying to find the page he/she needs. Wording and organization is poor. |